Zipper
0
Tengo una duda. Tengo en mis manos un libro que trata principalmente sobre la historia de los bootlegs y tal y aparece una supuesta cita de Michael, sacada, segun el libro, de Billboard 4 de julio 1987. Copio el fragmento y me gustaria que alguien me dijera si es cierto o algo xD
"The record company argument - which is that it's like giving away the master tape, and we have to stop it - is obviously a logical argument. But personally, I really don't care... the thought of people borrowing my records from their friends and taping them has never bothered me. My concern is that as many people as possible hear the music. In fact, since they're going to do it anyway, I think I'd prefer that they do it with digital quality. I'm still going to make enough money to live on one way or another, whether it's through publishing royalties, live performance or whatever...Personally, I think it might in some ways even be a good thing. Because if the profits get smaller, then maybe the lawyers and the accountants will start to fade away, and the music business can again be run by people who love music"
"The record company argument - which is that it's like giving away the master tape, and we have to stop it - is obviously a logical argument. But personally, I really don't care... the thought of people borrowing my records from their friends and taping them has never bothered me. My concern is that as many people as possible hear the music. In fact, since they're going to do it anyway, I think I'd prefer that they do it with digital quality. I'm still going to make enough money to live on one way or another, whether it's through publishing royalties, live performance or whatever...Personally, I think it might in some ways even be a good thing. Because if the profits get smaller, then maybe the lawyers and the accountants will start to fade away, and the music business can again be run by people who love music"