• Cambios en el aspecto y funcionamiento del foro. Ver detalles

Encuentran armas bioquímicas a 50 millas de Washington

Estados Unidos ha encontrado finalmente armas bioquímicas de destrucción masiva, pero no en Irak, sino a unas 50 millas de Washington, en las instalaciones militares de Fort Detrick, según informa el "The Washington Post".

El alijo de armas encontrado incluye 100 dosis de ántrax y otras peligrosas bacterias, que podrían ser los restos de un programa de guerra bacteriológica supuestamente abandonado durante la guerra fría.

Además de ántrax, se han hallado también agentes de guerra biológica como la "brucella melitensis", que causa la brucelosis, y la "klebsiella pneumoniae", que provoca una forma de neumonía.

El hallazgo se produjo en una gran operación de limpieza de residuos militares y basuras en el área de Fort Detrick, que, tras el inesperado hallazgo de agentes químicos, se ha convertido en un trabajo de coste muy elevado que requerirá un presupuesto de 25 millones de dólares.

El diario británico "The Guardian", se hace eco de esta información y destaca que, aparte del "Washington Post", ha pasado inadvertida en Estados Unidos.

Además, "The Guardian" subraya que las autoridades norteamericanas, al igual que ocurrió con las del régimen iraquí de Sadam Husein, alegan que no disponen de documentación sobre los agentes químicos encontrados.

De hecho, el "Washington Post" cita al coronel norteamericano John Ball, comandante de guarnición de Fort Derrick, haciendo las siguientes manifestaciones: "Lo encuentras, lo aislas y tratas de averiguar lo que es. Estamos aprendiendo, pero es muy caro".


y ahora quien desarma a USA?..
 
Gracias por la noticia mjtron, muy interesante.

Yo sigo haciéndome la misma pregunta: ¿Dónde están las armas de destrucción masiva del régimen iraquí?.

Esas armas con las que se justificó la invasión de un país que era un 'peligro para la humanidad', el 'mismísimo heredero del Tercer Reich'. Ahora resulta que no hay armas, ni han capturado a Sadam Husein, ni tienen ni idea de por dónde para Bin Laden. Eso sí, a los de siempre ya les han dado bien por saco y el botín está repartido. Pero la mentira ya no es un arte, ahora se miente sin pudor y no pasa nada. Como todo vale, si tus excusas se van cayendo una tras otra, te inventas otro pretexto o desvías la atención con la final de la Super Bowl, de American Idol o de lo que se tercie. Si eres la única superpotencia nadie te va a exigir responsabilidades.

Leí este artículo hace unos días y me pareció que daba en el clavo totalmente. Lo dejo aquí por si alguien quiere leerlo.

IS THERE ANYTHING LEFT THAT MATTERS?
by Joan Chittister, OSB

This is what I don't understand: All of a sudden nothing seems to matter.

First, they said they wanted Bin Laden "dead or alive." But they didn't get him. So now they tell us that it doesn't matter. Our mission is greater than one man.

Then they said they wanted Saddam Hussein, "dead or alive." He's apparently alive but we haven't got him yet, either. However, President Bush told reporters recently, "It doesn't matter. Our mission is greater than one man."

Finally, they told us that we were invading Iraq to destroy their weapons of mass destruction. Now they say those weapons probably don't exist. Maybe never existed. Apparently that doesn't matter either.

Except that it does matter.

I know we're not supposed to say that. I know it's called "unpatriotic".

But it's also called honesty. And dishonesty matters.


It matters that the infrastructure of a foreign nation that couldn't defend itself against us has been destroyed on the grounds that it was a military threat to the world.

It matters that it was destroyed by us under a new doctrine of "pre-emptive war" when there was apparently nothing worth pre-empting.

It surely matters to the families here whose sons went to war to make the world safe from weapons of mass destruction and will never come home.

It matters to families in the United States whose life support programs were ended, whose medical insurance ran out, whose food stamps were cut off, whose day care programs were eliminated so we could spend the money on sending an army to do what did not need to be done.

It matters to the Iraqi girl whose face was burned by a lamp that toppled over as a result of a U.S. bombing run.

It matters to Ali, the Iraqi boy who lost his family - and both his arms - in a U.S. air attack.

It matters to the people in Baghdad whose water supply is now fetid, whose electricity is gone, whose streets are unsafe, whose 158 government ministries' buildings and all their records have been destroyed, whose cultural heritage and social system has been looted and whose cities teem with anti-American protests.

It matters that the people we say we "liberated" do not feel liberated in the midst of the lawlessness, destruction and wholesale social suffering that so-called liberation created.

It matters to the United Nations whose integrity was impugned, whose authority was denied, whose inspection teams are even now still being overlooked in the process of technical evaluation and disarmament.

It matters to the reputation of the United States in the eyes of the world, both now and for decades to come, perhaps.

And surely it matters to the integrity of this nation whether or not its intelligence gathering agencies have any real intelligence or not before we launch a military armada on its say-so.


And it should matter whether or not our government is either incompetent and didn't know what they were doing or were dishonest and refused to say. The unspoken truth is that either as a people we were misled, or we were lied to, about the real reason for this war. Either we made a huge - and unforgivable - mistake, an arrogant or ignorant mistake, or we are swaggering around the world like a blind giant, flailing in all directions while the rest of the world watches in horror or in ridicule.

If Bill Clinton's definition of "is" matters, surely this matters. If a president's sex life matters, surely a president's use of global force against some of the weakest people in the world matters. If a president's word in a court of law about a private indiscretion matters, surely a president's word to the community of nations and the security of millions of people matters.

And if not, why not? If not, surely there is something as wrong with us as citizens, as thinkers, as Christians as there must be with some facet of the government. If wars that the public says are wrong yesterday - as over 70% of U.S. citizens did before the attack on Iraq - suddenly become "right" the minute the first bombs drop, what kind of national morality is that?

Of what are we really capable as a nation if the considered judgment of politicians and people around the world means nothing to us as a people?

What is the depth of the American soul if we can allow destruction to be done in our name and the name of "liberation" and never even demand an accounting of its costs, both personal and public, when it is over?

We like to take comfort in the notion that people make a distinction between our government and ourselves. We like to say that the people of the world love Americans, they simply mistrust our government. But excoriating a distant and anonymous "government" for wreaking rubble on a nation in pretense of good requires very little of either character or intelligence.

What may count most, however, is that we may well be the ones Proverbs warns when it reminds us: "Kings take pleasure in honest lips; they value the one who speaks the truth." The point is clear: If the people speak and the king doesn't listen, there is something wrong with the king. If the king acts precipitously and the people say nothing, something is wrong with the people.

It may be time for us to realize that in a country that prides itself on being democratic, we are our government. And the rest of the world is figuring that out very quickly.

From where I stand, that matters.

Published on Thursday, May 29, 2003 by the National Catholic Reporter
 
Atrás
Arriba