HOla tenia un rao sin escribir en el foro
encontre esto y me parece que no lo han publicado aun por aca es una entrevista con Marc Schaffel habla de el por que Wmcig no ha salido aun y uno uqe oro detalle interesante
bye....
05/07/2002 An Interview with Marc Schaffel
Marc Schaffel, the executive producer of the WHAT MORE CAN I GIVE project, has recently been interviewed by Pascale, one of Michael Jackson's most loyal fans.
In an exclusive interview, Marc Schaffel talks about the situation and the future of "What More Can I Give." Here is the complete transcript of the interview.
Who wrote and composed "What More Can I Give"?
—Michael Jackson.
Who are the artists who participated in the recording of the English and Spanish versions of "What More Can I Give"?
—Michael Jackson, English and Spanish; Celine Dion, English and Spanish; Billy Gilman, English; Reba McEntire, English; Usher, English; Mariah Carey, English and Spanish; Ricky Martin, English and Spanish; Beyonce Knowles (Destiny's Child), English; Mya, English and Spanish; Gloria Estefan, English and Spanish; Luther Vandross, English and Spanish; Shawn Stockman & Michael McCary (Boyz II Men), English; 3LW, English; Brian McKnight, English and Spanish; Anastacia, English and Spanish; Thalia, English and Spanish; Aaron Carter, English; Ziggy Marley, English; Tom Petty, English; *NSync, English and Spanish; Hanson, English; Nick Carter (Backstreet Boys), English;
Carlos Santana, English and Spanish; Alejandro Sanz, Spanish; Cristian Castro, Spanish; Jon Secada, English and Spanish; Julio Iglesias, Spanish; Juan Gabriel, Spanish; Luis Miguel, Spanish; Shakira, English and Spanish; Ruben Blades, Spanish; Laura Pausini, Spanish; Joy Enriquez, Spanish; Bryton, English; Olga Tanon, Spanish.
When was the song recorded and for what purpose?
—The Music was recorded previously to September 11th, as the original intention was that "What More Can I Give" would be the sequel to "We are the World." It was Michael Jackson's original idea that the funds would go to children's charities of all kinds around the world. After September 11th, the vocals were recorded by the celebrities above and the focus changed to be a fund-raiser for the victims, victims' families (survivors), and child charities (both directly related to September 11th and some that were just related to helping children).
What was your task as the executive producer of this song?
—My tasks included organizing the entire project, from the financial aspects to the actual daily production. This may include everything from musically related items of the recording, to all the video, behind the scenes, (Including documentary) deals with aspects of television, print, artists relations, legal matters, finances, etc. Pretty much put together the entire thing from beginning to end.
What are the reasons why the single has not been commercially released?
—As I had stated in the past, The singles were not released at first when completed because Sony Music felt there would be a conflict with releasing this at the same time as Michael Jackson's "Invincible" record. That was never my feeling or the feeling of many of Michael's supporters, who felt that releasing the two at the same time would only have help in the marketing of the both records. The other thing you have to remember is that even though Michael wrote the song and performs on it, there are 34 other artists involved that share in the credit. So this is not just a Michael Jackson project. That alone should have been enough to release it when it was first completed. After the "Invincible" release, the relationship between Sony Music and Michael had quickly deteriorated and the song became a "Bargaining chip," if you would, or a pawn, in Sony's corner. However it is not only Michael that gets hurt if this is not released, Sony is punishing many innocent people who would have been the beneficiaries of the much needed proceeds. This is the saddest part. It is the most blatant disgusting act of Corporate greed I have ever seen. Sony should be ashamed of themselves and the public should not let them get away with this without a stink. Michael Jackson and others, including myself, have already footed the bill to make these songs. It would not have even been any kind of expense for Sony to release this, and their could be no reason in the world to justify "throwing away" the hard work of so many artists who donated their time for this cause. Sony just does not want Michael Jackson to be associated with, or have any project out there that would be a number one hit (especially something that another label would release) when he might be shopping for another deal. They also feel that by the song not coming out, MJ will receive negative press for announcing his intentions and not following through. Every single person who had heard the two songs have been absolutely sure they are both number one hits. The Spanish version produced by Grammy Award winning KC Porter has been said to be a number one hit in both markets as well.
After Sony refused to release the single, have you tried to bring the project to another record company?
—I have met with other labels who all have said they would release these songs in a heartbeat if Tommy Mottola would allow them to. However, because it is a charity record and the record company would not be making the normal profits off releasing it, nobody is willing to start an internal feud with Sony for the ability to release it. If Sony were willing to give the permission to another label to release the songs, and would guarantee that the Sony artists involved be allowed to feature on this special record (something that all the other labels had already accepted when they thought Sony was going to release the songs), "What More Can I Give" could be released by another record company without any trouble.
Up to now, how have Sony Japan Headquarters been reacting to all this?
—They have not responded at all. They must not feel —even though people from all over the world were victims, both actually during the attacks and as a ripple result after— it is a big enough problem for them to step in and take over. I was shocked at no response at all, as I always felt the Japanese and especially a company like Sony would not fall to "Low Level" politics like this. This is not an honorable stance to be taking. This has completely changed my feelings toward that company, and anytime I would got to buy something, I will remember them and choose not to buy their products. If enough people in the world realized their actions, I feel they would do the same.
If the song was to be released after all, throgh Sony or another company, what proceeds could it create?
—That would depend on how much marketing and promoting they'd put into it. You should not have to "beg" anyone to be a part of such a worthwhile cause. That is one of the issues that I knew we were going to have problems with when we first discussed the release. If you just "dump" a release out without proper marketing and promotion it can only do as well as what is behind it. Obviously if there is something behind it and a push from the label, it would double or triple the sales. I feel, Sony could not believe that I was able to deliver the singles as promised, since previous Michael Jackson projects have missed their anticipated completion dates. I feel they agreed at first because they just figured it would never be completed as promised in a million years, and they just wanted to appease Michael who was so passionate about this project. I also do not think Sony anticipated the next problem of it being ready to be released at the same time as the "Invincible" album. However, with all that being in the past, there is no reason whatsoever why this should not be released for the one year anniversary.
How would the proceeds of the record be distributed to the victims?
—That will be an issue agreed upon by the designed charities and the artists who would be involved in researching the charities to be recipients. They would then instruct the record company who would be cutting the checks. I know in the past it was discussed to keep the charities as much "grass roots" as possible. So that the money reaches the needy receptionist without going through administrative challenged organizations. It was discussed that each charity would be capped as to the amount of funds they would receive so the amount of charities benefiting would be much greater. The other item discussed was in certain areas such as South America, having the funds generated there by sales going to organizations in that region.
What is the deadline to receive the green light from Sony to release the song in time for the September 11th anniversary?
—In order to have a successful September 11th release, the deadline is... NOW!
You probably know by now that Michael Jackson's fans have been very active in many ways to support their artist, including demonstrating against Sony, promoting "Invincible", advising the press about the feud, etc. What could the fans do to convince Sony to permit the release of "What More Can I Give"?
—Well publicly bringing this to the attention of the world is the best. I know that hitting Sony in the pocket book, and bad public relations, is another great way of ensuring this gets released and is done properly. The last thing we want is for this to be just "dumped" out for the sake of the pressure being taken off and minimal funds being raised. All eyes need to be on the company that puts this out to make sure proper attention is given. I know the Sony shareholders are meeting soon. Maybe the last effort should be made to focus on them. If they understand how this issue could potentially hurt Sony both in public relations and sales, they will demand the release or replace the people who are hindering this and have made this such a public spectacle for Sony. We need as much support now as ever. Every fan base from all the artists involved should be making the same demands. Charities that can show they give directly to the needy victims should be getting involved by publicly calling upon Sony to release this or let someone release this. They need to let Sony know not to "throw this away." You cannot just "throw" people's lives away because it is not convenient for you at this time. The charities and all people alike need to join in by publicly showing the world how "stupid" this game is that the record company is playing, and get the victims to write, picket, demonstrate, contact the media, etc. Sony only hopes time will pass and this issue will go away, they do not want to face the public in a bad light. It would be so easy for them to put a little elbow grease behind this and do it properly. Raising a lot of funds would sure help close this wound and give the public a different view. One journalist told me that Sony's nonchalant response was that they already donated 13 million dollars in the past for charitable purposes, and they do not need to do this to prove anything to anyone. They refuse to be "strong armed" into any fundraising effort. Maybe Sony needs to stop for a second and listen to the lyrics "WHAT MORE CAN I GIVE," and then ask themselves that same question.
Thank you to Marc Schaffel and to Pascale for her dedication.
Please support the release of «What More Can I Give».
Circulate the petition and sign it!
The WHAT MORE CAN I GIVE Petition http://www.petitiononline.com/WMCIG/petition.html
encontre esto y me parece que no lo han publicado aun por aca es una entrevista con Marc Schaffel habla de el por que Wmcig no ha salido aun y uno uqe oro detalle interesante
bye....
05/07/2002 An Interview with Marc Schaffel
Marc Schaffel, the executive producer of the WHAT MORE CAN I GIVE project, has recently been interviewed by Pascale, one of Michael Jackson's most loyal fans.
In an exclusive interview, Marc Schaffel talks about the situation and the future of "What More Can I Give." Here is the complete transcript of the interview.
Who wrote and composed "What More Can I Give"?
—Michael Jackson.
Who are the artists who participated in the recording of the English and Spanish versions of "What More Can I Give"?
—Michael Jackson, English and Spanish; Celine Dion, English and Spanish; Billy Gilman, English; Reba McEntire, English; Usher, English; Mariah Carey, English and Spanish; Ricky Martin, English and Spanish; Beyonce Knowles (Destiny's Child), English; Mya, English and Spanish; Gloria Estefan, English and Spanish; Luther Vandross, English and Spanish; Shawn Stockman & Michael McCary (Boyz II Men), English; 3LW, English; Brian McKnight, English and Spanish; Anastacia, English and Spanish; Thalia, English and Spanish; Aaron Carter, English; Ziggy Marley, English; Tom Petty, English; *NSync, English and Spanish; Hanson, English; Nick Carter (Backstreet Boys), English;
Carlos Santana, English and Spanish; Alejandro Sanz, Spanish; Cristian Castro, Spanish; Jon Secada, English and Spanish; Julio Iglesias, Spanish; Juan Gabriel, Spanish; Luis Miguel, Spanish; Shakira, English and Spanish; Ruben Blades, Spanish; Laura Pausini, Spanish; Joy Enriquez, Spanish; Bryton, English; Olga Tanon, Spanish.
When was the song recorded and for what purpose?
—The Music was recorded previously to September 11th, as the original intention was that "What More Can I Give" would be the sequel to "We are the World." It was Michael Jackson's original idea that the funds would go to children's charities of all kinds around the world. After September 11th, the vocals were recorded by the celebrities above and the focus changed to be a fund-raiser for the victims, victims' families (survivors), and child charities (both directly related to September 11th and some that were just related to helping children).
What was your task as the executive producer of this song?
—My tasks included organizing the entire project, from the financial aspects to the actual daily production. This may include everything from musically related items of the recording, to all the video, behind the scenes, (Including documentary) deals with aspects of television, print, artists relations, legal matters, finances, etc. Pretty much put together the entire thing from beginning to end.
What are the reasons why the single has not been commercially released?
—As I had stated in the past, The singles were not released at first when completed because Sony Music felt there would be a conflict with releasing this at the same time as Michael Jackson's "Invincible" record. That was never my feeling or the feeling of many of Michael's supporters, who felt that releasing the two at the same time would only have help in the marketing of the both records. The other thing you have to remember is that even though Michael wrote the song and performs on it, there are 34 other artists involved that share in the credit. So this is not just a Michael Jackson project. That alone should have been enough to release it when it was first completed. After the "Invincible" release, the relationship between Sony Music and Michael had quickly deteriorated and the song became a "Bargaining chip," if you would, or a pawn, in Sony's corner. However it is not only Michael that gets hurt if this is not released, Sony is punishing many innocent people who would have been the beneficiaries of the much needed proceeds. This is the saddest part. It is the most blatant disgusting act of Corporate greed I have ever seen. Sony should be ashamed of themselves and the public should not let them get away with this without a stink. Michael Jackson and others, including myself, have already footed the bill to make these songs. It would not have even been any kind of expense for Sony to release this, and their could be no reason in the world to justify "throwing away" the hard work of so many artists who donated their time for this cause. Sony just does not want Michael Jackson to be associated with, or have any project out there that would be a number one hit (especially something that another label would release) when he might be shopping for another deal. They also feel that by the song not coming out, MJ will receive negative press for announcing his intentions and not following through. Every single person who had heard the two songs have been absolutely sure they are both number one hits. The Spanish version produced by Grammy Award winning KC Porter has been said to be a number one hit in both markets as well.
After Sony refused to release the single, have you tried to bring the project to another record company?
—I have met with other labels who all have said they would release these songs in a heartbeat if Tommy Mottola would allow them to. However, because it is a charity record and the record company would not be making the normal profits off releasing it, nobody is willing to start an internal feud with Sony for the ability to release it. If Sony were willing to give the permission to another label to release the songs, and would guarantee that the Sony artists involved be allowed to feature on this special record (something that all the other labels had already accepted when they thought Sony was going to release the songs), "What More Can I Give" could be released by another record company without any trouble.
Up to now, how have Sony Japan Headquarters been reacting to all this?
—They have not responded at all. They must not feel —even though people from all over the world were victims, both actually during the attacks and as a ripple result after— it is a big enough problem for them to step in and take over. I was shocked at no response at all, as I always felt the Japanese and especially a company like Sony would not fall to "Low Level" politics like this. This is not an honorable stance to be taking. This has completely changed my feelings toward that company, and anytime I would got to buy something, I will remember them and choose not to buy their products. If enough people in the world realized their actions, I feel they would do the same.
If the song was to be released after all, throgh Sony or another company, what proceeds could it create?
—That would depend on how much marketing and promoting they'd put into it. You should not have to "beg" anyone to be a part of such a worthwhile cause. That is one of the issues that I knew we were going to have problems with when we first discussed the release. If you just "dump" a release out without proper marketing and promotion it can only do as well as what is behind it. Obviously if there is something behind it and a push from the label, it would double or triple the sales. I feel, Sony could not believe that I was able to deliver the singles as promised, since previous Michael Jackson projects have missed their anticipated completion dates. I feel they agreed at first because they just figured it would never be completed as promised in a million years, and they just wanted to appease Michael who was so passionate about this project. I also do not think Sony anticipated the next problem of it being ready to be released at the same time as the "Invincible" album. However, with all that being in the past, there is no reason whatsoever why this should not be released for the one year anniversary.
How would the proceeds of the record be distributed to the victims?
—That will be an issue agreed upon by the designed charities and the artists who would be involved in researching the charities to be recipients. They would then instruct the record company who would be cutting the checks. I know in the past it was discussed to keep the charities as much "grass roots" as possible. So that the money reaches the needy receptionist without going through administrative challenged organizations. It was discussed that each charity would be capped as to the amount of funds they would receive so the amount of charities benefiting would be much greater. The other item discussed was in certain areas such as South America, having the funds generated there by sales going to organizations in that region.
What is the deadline to receive the green light from Sony to release the song in time for the September 11th anniversary?
—In order to have a successful September 11th release, the deadline is... NOW!
You probably know by now that Michael Jackson's fans have been very active in many ways to support their artist, including demonstrating against Sony, promoting "Invincible", advising the press about the feud, etc. What could the fans do to convince Sony to permit the release of "What More Can I Give"?
—Well publicly bringing this to the attention of the world is the best. I know that hitting Sony in the pocket book, and bad public relations, is another great way of ensuring this gets released and is done properly. The last thing we want is for this to be just "dumped" out for the sake of the pressure being taken off and minimal funds being raised. All eyes need to be on the company that puts this out to make sure proper attention is given. I know the Sony shareholders are meeting soon. Maybe the last effort should be made to focus on them. If they understand how this issue could potentially hurt Sony both in public relations and sales, they will demand the release or replace the people who are hindering this and have made this such a public spectacle for Sony. We need as much support now as ever. Every fan base from all the artists involved should be making the same demands. Charities that can show they give directly to the needy victims should be getting involved by publicly calling upon Sony to release this or let someone release this. They need to let Sony know not to "throw this away." You cannot just "throw" people's lives away because it is not convenient for you at this time. The charities and all people alike need to join in by publicly showing the world how "stupid" this game is that the record company is playing, and get the victims to write, picket, demonstrate, contact the media, etc. Sony only hopes time will pass and this issue will go away, they do not want to face the public in a bad light. It would be so easy for them to put a little elbow grease behind this and do it properly. Raising a lot of funds would sure help close this wound and give the public a different view. One journalist told me that Sony's nonchalant response was that they already donated 13 million dollars in the past for charitable purposes, and they do not need to do this to prove anything to anyone. They refuse to be "strong armed" into any fundraising effort. Maybe Sony needs to stop for a second and listen to the lyrics "WHAT MORE CAN I GIVE," and then ask themselves that same question.
Thank you to Marc Schaffel and to Pascale for her dedication.
Please support the release of «What More Can I Give».
Circulate the petition and sign it!
The WHAT MORE CAN I GIVE Petition http://www.petitiononline.com/WMCIG/petition.html
