Did Michael Jackson call a secret meeting of his entire family last month to tell them about his newly expected children?
According to my sources, Jackson convened all of his immediate family members — parents, siblings, nieces and nephews — at Neverland on June 5 for a special meeting. Jackson himself was physically absent but was on a speaker-phone set up so he could address the group. All the siblings were there with the exception of Janet, I am told.
One theory is that Jackson told the group there would be at least one additional member soon, thanks to a woman who claimed to be pregnant by him through artificial insemination. But no one knows for sure, and now — even with US Weekly and the National Enquirer fighting over who broke the story — there is doubt that Jackson has a new child or children coming at all.
Yesterday, inner circle members of the Jackson group absolutely and categorically denied the current story, saying that Michael had not fathered one or four new babies who would be due around February. "No, no, no" is what I got from people I consider as close to Jackson as they can be.
On the other hand, at least two other Jackson intimates believe that some form of the new babies story has some veracity. They say that Jackson often kept company with a mysterious and wealthy young Palm Beach woman named Sylvia who would come to visit the pop star in a chauffeur-driven Bentley when he stayed in Miami.
:jajaja:
One source says: "My wife once tried to get friendly with Sylvia, get her last name, invite her to dinner, when Michael wasn't in the room. Michael was furious. He said we were nosy for trying to find out about his personal life.":sacabo: :sacabo:
Could Jackson really have arranged with this woman or another to carry his child(ren) with none of his lawyers or associates aware of the plan? One former associate told me yesterday: "Yes. I know because I did things for him where I was the only one who knew what was going on. It can be done, and Michael likes to do things that way."
If the new baby story is a lie, as Jackson's insiders claim, then the question is, where did it come from? In the meantime, another source — one who has access to Jackson's accounts payable — says so far no one has billed the pop star for unusual legal work, and no cash outlays have been attributed to potential surrogate mothers.
According to my sources, Jackson convened all of his immediate family members — parents, siblings, nieces and nephews — at Neverland on June 5 for a special meeting. Jackson himself was physically absent but was on a speaker-phone set up so he could address the group. All the siblings were there with the exception of Janet, I am told.
One theory is that Jackson told the group there would be at least one additional member soon, thanks to a woman who claimed to be pregnant by him through artificial insemination. But no one knows for sure, and now — even with US Weekly and the National Enquirer fighting over who broke the story — there is doubt that Jackson has a new child or children coming at all.
Yesterday, inner circle members of the Jackson group absolutely and categorically denied the current story, saying that Michael had not fathered one or four new babies who would be due around February. "No, no, no" is what I got from people I consider as close to Jackson as they can be.
On the other hand, at least two other Jackson intimates believe that some form of the new babies story has some veracity. They say that Jackson often kept company with a mysterious and wealthy young Palm Beach woman named Sylvia who would come to visit the pop star in a chauffeur-driven Bentley when he stayed in Miami.
:jajaja: One source says: "My wife once tried to get friendly with Sylvia, get her last name, invite her to dinner, when Michael wasn't in the room. Michael was furious. He said we were nosy for trying to find out about his personal life.":sacabo: :sacabo:
Could Jackson really have arranged with this woman or another to carry his child(ren) with none of his lawyers or associates aware of the plan? One former associate told me yesterday: "Yes. I know because I did things for him where I was the only one who knew what was going on. It can be done, and Michael likes to do things that way."
If the new baby story is a lie, as Jackson's insiders claim, then the question is, where did it come from? In the meantime, another source — one who has access to Jackson's accounts payable — says so far no one has billed the pop star for unusual legal work, and no cash outlays have been attributed to potential surrogate mothers.