• Cambios en el aspecto y funcionamiento del foro. Ver detalles

La verdad

Este lo encontre en una pagina de mike .. y aca si dice toda la verdadacerca de la historia lisa, mike-- aca esta todo claro .. disculpen si no lo tradusco ...

I think that it is interesting that Lisa said that their marriage was
very real and that she definently was in love with Michael. I wonder if
the media will pick up that part,since THEY have called the marriage
fake. It is also interesting to note that she states that the REAL
Michael is not the one that the media "sees." Most aware and inteligent
fans have known this forever. Chris Tucker,SIsqo,Rodney Jerkins,Teddy
Riley,Liz,Liza and just about ANYONE who has met MIchael and is a friend
of his,will tell you that Michael is very different in private that what
he is
in his public persona. They say that he is extremely
down-to-earth,humorous as hell,etc. Most have said that his voice is
much deeper in person than what he hear in public.

Lisa sounds like a bitter and scourned woman. Why would a woman who
feels manipulated run after a man AFTER they were divorced? Why would
she run after a man who was married to another woman? Why would she be
seen with MJ holding hands,all over the world,with her children IF she
felt manipulated? No one forced this woman to go running to Michael's
side. No one forced her to continue to visit and be friends with the
Jackson family for years after the divorce,with the hope(imo) of
"getting" Michael back.

Lisa doesn't mention that Michael probably felt manipulated that she
told the world on the day that their marriage was revealed that she
"loved MJ ver much and they were going to start a family." Lisa doesn't
mention that she later told Michael that she didn't want any children.

Why does she conveniently leave out the fact that Michael left
HER,because she LIED about wanting to start a family? Is she ashamed
that he turned to a friend of 20 years (Debbie) to discuss his deswire
to have children when his wife decided not to? Why does she not mention
the day that she went to the hospital to visit MJ with a smile and came
out with a huge frown and arms folded? Photos will confirm that this is
true. Is it because as it has been rumored that Michael told her that
Debbie was pregnant with his child?

I thought that her response to the question about the scam of 1993 was
telling. She said that if that had been HER child who was supposedly
molested,she would have taken no money and would have probably killed
the bastard. She also suggested that she would have never married MJ,if
she suspected that he was a molestor.

LM's former manager and friend,(I can't think of his name) told People
magazine that he had never seen Lisa happier than when she was married
to Michael. Her uncle told Larry King the same thing.

Judging from this intervies.LM still has it "bad" for Michael. She can't
seem to get over him. I wonder why she waited until now to TALK about
him? Could it possibly be to just SELL a new album?(sarcasm intended).

Despite all the talk of MIchael being irrelevant,HE is still the ONLY
reason that the media is interested in her. Before Michael,Lisa would
never have been as newsworthy as the media is portraying her to be.
Being Elvis' daughter had never caused her to receive none of the
attention that she garners as being the ex-wife of Michael. Like the
media and everyone else,she will USE his name to capitalize.
 
Despite all the talk of MIchael being irrelevant,HE is still the ONLY
reason that the media is interested in her. Before Michael,Lisa would
never have been as newsworthy as the media is portraying her to be.
Being Elvis' daughter had never caused her to receive none of the
attention that she garners as being the ex-wife of Michael. Like the
media and everyone else,she will USE his name to capitalize.

Quien haya escrito esto tiene mucha razón
 
Toma ya!!!si esq la Lisa esa no hace na mas que criticar sera amargada!!!!!! la odio, que ha hecho en su vida esa tia??
 
Prefiero quedarme con esta visión de las cosas , en las que sí se
reafirma que Jackson es otra persona distinta en la intimidad.

Ya sabemos, por aquello de preservar de los "buitres" su yo más
genuino. Estoy de acuerdo en el hecho de que él simplemente sea
natural en privado (eso incluye un gran sentido del humor , el cual
incluso en público ha dejado translucir), incluso el detalle de algún
vicio (dicen que humaniza) pero de ahí a ponerle de despotricador
como la Belenchy Estéban pol ejemplo..., no sé , pero le quita el encanto de ese ser especial que, de fijo, es el chico, ¿no?
 
alguien podria traducirlo porfavor, es que no entiendo bien el reportaje ya que mi ingles no es muy bueno :muac:
 
Sigo pensando que los moderadores deberían impartir un curso de inglés intensivo para los hideouters :meparto: :p se ahorrarían leer mensajes tipo "alguién puede traducirlo?" :p
 
Atrás
Arriba