WE DEMAND the refutation of false articles about Michael Jackson, posted 20.06.2016!
https://www.change.org/p/nfo-360tv-ru-we-demand-the-refutation-of-false-articles-about-michael-jackson-posted-20-06-2016?recruiter=89893195&utm_source=petitions_show_components_action_panel_wrapper&utm_medium=copylink
To RadarOnline.com and to all the sources that spread the lie:
June 20, 2016 RadarOnline.com published an article on the results of search of Michael Jackson`s Neverland Ranch in Los Olivos, Calif., in November 2003, referring to some police sources in Santa Barbara Sheriff's Department . The article claims, that child porn was found during that search. It also includes the files which claimed to be «the never before seen police reports».
Soon after that, the news spread through hundreds of news agencies, online publications and blogs around the world. Unfortunately «Vanity Fair» was in fact the only resource who reached out to the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Department for confirmation and comment. After that, it became very clear that The Sheriff’s Office «did not release any of the documents and/or photographs to the media and that some of the documents appear to be copies of reports that were authored by Sheriff’s Office personnel as well as evidentiary photographs taken by Sheriff’s Office personnel interspersed with content that appears to be obtained off the Internet or through unknown sources».
Despite the published by «Vanity Fair» statement from Sheriff’s Department none of the below-listed resources didn`t refute false information posted earlier, they didn`t even remove the false articles. People tried to bring information about the statement in the post`s comments, tried to e-mail to editors but never received any response or comments from any of them.
How come, that among all the resources, only «Vanity Fair» bothered to do a check, by reaching out the Sheriff Department`s office? Is there anyone else, who wants to be the real professional journalist, who is concerned in the authenticity of the information that has been posted? Why everybody totally ignored the fact that Michael Jackson was acquitted on salacious charges by a jury in 2005? Needless to say, that during the trial the prosecution DID NOT SHOW any child pornography to the jury!
We believe that publications like that, as well as neglect of refuting them, raises questions about the competence of the media involved. We want the media to be more responsible and careful to prevent the spreading of false information.
We want an objective and truthful media. There is a list of sources below, and we demand from each of them urgent refutation of the posted material.
There's nothing that can't be done
If we raise our voice as one
https://www.change.org/p/nfo-360tv-ru-we-demand-the-refutation-of-false-articles-about-michael-jackson-posted-20-06-2016?recruiter=89893195&utm_source=petitions_show_components_action_panel_wrapper&utm_medium=copylink
To RadarOnline.com and to all the sources that spread the lie:
June 20, 2016 RadarOnline.com published an article on the results of search of Michael Jackson`s Neverland Ranch in Los Olivos, Calif., in November 2003, referring to some police sources in Santa Barbara Sheriff's Department . The article claims, that child porn was found during that search. It also includes the files which claimed to be «the never before seen police reports».
Soon after that, the news spread through hundreds of news agencies, online publications and blogs around the world. Unfortunately «Vanity Fair» was in fact the only resource who reached out to the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Department for confirmation and comment. After that, it became very clear that The Sheriff’s Office «did not release any of the documents and/or photographs to the media and that some of the documents appear to be copies of reports that were authored by Sheriff’s Office personnel as well as evidentiary photographs taken by Sheriff’s Office personnel interspersed with content that appears to be obtained off the Internet or through unknown sources».
Despite the published by «Vanity Fair» statement from Sheriff’s Department none of the below-listed resources didn`t refute false information posted earlier, they didn`t even remove the false articles. People tried to bring information about the statement in the post`s comments, tried to e-mail to editors but never received any response or comments from any of them.
How come, that among all the resources, only «Vanity Fair» bothered to do a check, by reaching out the Sheriff Department`s office? Is there anyone else, who wants to be the real professional journalist, who is concerned in the authenticity of the information that has been posted? Why everybody totally ignored the fact that Michael Jackson was acquitted on salacious charges by a jury in 2005? Needless to say, that during the trial the prosecution DID NOT SHOW any child pornography to the jury!
We believe that publications like that, as well as neglect of refuting them, raises questions about the competence of the media involved. We want the media to be more responsible and careful to prevent the spreading of false information.
We want an objective and truthful media. There is a list of sources below, and we demand from each of them urgent refutation of the posted material.
There's nothing that can't be done
If we raise our voice as one
Última edición:
