• Cambios en el aspecto y funcionamiento del foro. Ver detalles

[13 de mayo] 59º Día de Juicio: Noticias y Fotos

Lo ha postead Ja' en el MJJForum, pero no dice fuente:

Dicen que después del descanso, le preguntaron a Geragos sobre DESPUÉS de que le imputaran los cargos a Michael y lo ficharan. Geragos paró a Mez y dijo que él no había firmado un 'complete waiver' (se refiere a renunicar por completo al derecho de confidencialidad de cliente-abogado) para contestar preguntas sobre el caso después del arresto de Michael. Melville miró a Mez y le dijo: "¿Qué pasa aquí? Pensaba que el 'waiver' había sido firmado y entregado". Mez respondió que así era, pero que no lo tenía ahí.

---

COURT TV:

- El jurado ha vuelto a sus asientos y Mark continuará respondiendo preguntas sólo hasta el arresto de MJ en '03.

- Melville amonestó a Mez debido a esto.

- Zonen ha adelantado que no terminará con el interrogatorio de Gerados hasta el lunes.
 
Última edición:
Yahoo News:

"Intentaba prevenir un crimen contra mi cliente. Pensaba que estaban intentando extorsionarle"

Sobre la contratación del investigador; "Estaba preocupado en ese momento, dado lo que estaba pasando, alguien podría manipular a mi cliente. Quise saber quienes eran, qué hacían, con quien se veían"

Dice que sus sospechas se confirmaron en parte cuando hizo una búsqueda en la base de datos de asaltos sexuales y encontró una de la madre contra una tienda (JC Penney).

Tras cinco o seis semanas de investigación, Geragos llegó a la conclusión de que Jackson debía romper todos los vínculos con la familia.

"Sentía como si se estuviese gestando un gran desastre".

Bajo el contra interrogatorio, Geragos dijo que Jackson sabía que había niños durmiendo en su habitación, pero que Jackson explicaba "que él no hace nada... que no es nada sexual... que si alguien pasa la noche en su habitación se trata de amor incondicional"

Dijo que su primera impresión de Jackson es la de ver a un hombre que es padre pero a su manera es como un niño; "No vi nada infame" dijo.
 
Articulo de Linda Deutsch, agencia AP.

Lawyer: Jackson Said Nothing Happened

1 minute ago



SANTA MARIA, Calif. - Michael Jackson's former attorney Mark Geragos testified at the pop star's child molestation trial Friday that Jackson told him his accuser had slept in his bed but that nothing sexual had happened.


Geragos, who testified that he investigated the accuser's family and became gravely concerned about them, was cross-examined on whether he ever asked Jackson if the boy slept in his bed.

"Yes, he said nothing happened," Geragos testified. "He said he didn't do anything untoward or sexual and if anyone spent the night in his room it was unconditional love."

Geragos also gave a ringing defense of his former client as he described his first visit to Jackson's Neverland ranch.

"When I was there, what I saw was a gentleman who was almost childlike in his love for kids. I didn't see anyone doing anything nefarious or criminal. I saw someone who was ripe as a target," he said.

Geragos said he was hired around the time of the February 2003 airing of a documentary in which Jackson appeared with the boy now accusing him of molestation. In the documentary, Jackson said that he let children sleep in his bed but that it was non-sexual.

Under questioning by Jackson attorney Thomas Mesereau Jr., Geragos said he was concerned about allegations spawned by the documentary and was particularly concerned that the boy or his family might take advantage of them.

He said he did database searches to see if the family had a "litigious history" and was disturbed to find they had previously sued J.C. Penney over allegations they were beaten by security guards. The family received a $150,000 settlement.

"I was gravely concerned," Geragos said.

Geragos said he hired a private investigator to look into the family, and the results led him to believe the family was bad news.

"Michael should have nothing to do with them," he said. "It was a pending disaster."

Mesereau asked Geragos if he was aware of any crime committed against the family. Geragos said no.

"I was trying to prevent a crime against my client," he said. "I thought that they were going to shake him down."

Jackson replaced Geragos as his attorney in April 2004.

Jackson, 46, is accused of molesting a 13-year-old cancer patient in February or March 2003 and plying him with wine. He is also accused of conspiring to hold the boy's family captive to get them to make a video rebutting the documentary.

Geragos came to court under threat of arrest. Judge Rodney S. Melville issued the warning Thursday when a Geragos colleague sought to reschedule his testimony because of other courtroom obligations. But the judge ordered him to be there at 8:30 a.m.

Geragos arrived well in advance but then waited around for hours while attorneys questioned another witness. The judge became exasperated.

"I have this picture of a lawyer upstairs walking back and forth pulling his hair out of his head wondering why I called him here today under threat of a warrant while Mr. Mesereau goes on and on," the judge said. "What's wrong with that picture?"

Mesereau replied, "It's pretty accurate, I think, your honor."

___

Associated Press Writer Tim Molloy contributed to this report

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050513/ap_on_en_mu/michael_jackson_5
 
Lo importante del texto de Mó_Ònw4lk3r:

Articulo de Linda Deutsch, agencia AP.

Geragos describió su primera visita a Neverland ranch.

"Cuando estaba allí, lo que vi fue a un caballero que era casi como un niño en su amor hacia los niños. No vi a nadie que hiciera nada infame ni criminal. Vi a alguien que está siendo hundido como objetivo".

El resto es lo que puse en la noticia anterior ;)
 
Al parecer Mark Geragos no volverá hasta el Viernes que viene, ya que el Lunes tiene otro juicio. El siguiente testigo puede ser Bradley Miller, el investigador de Geragos.
 
Sneddon ha presentado una moción para que no se admita el testimonio de Angel Vivanco (un empleado de Neverland con el que Janet habló varias veces por teléfono incluso después de 'escapar' del rancho y al que dijo no conocer de nada en su declaración). Parece que Vivanco estuvo liado con Davelyn :eek: y le dijeron que estaban preparando 'algo grande' sobre MJ. Vivanco dirá como vió a Star y Gavin bebiendo alcohol y teniendo revistas porno antes de febrero y marzo de 2003 sin que MJ estuviera en el rancho.
 
Michael Bonito! Si es que me haz matado con ese beso!

Beso.jpg



saludo.jpg
 
Última edición:
newmast.gif


Ex abogado de Jackson asegura que fue 'blanco' para demanda


Por LINDA DEUTSCH
© 2005 The Associated Press

SANTA MARIA, California, EEUU (AP) _ Mark Geragos, un ex abogado de Michael Jackson, declaró el viernes en el juicio por abuso de menor que, según el cantante, su acusador le dijo había dormido en su cama sin que se produjera un acto de naturaleza sexual.

Geragos, quien declaró que investigaba a la familia del querellante y que se mostró muy preocupado tras revisar el pasado de los demandantes, fue interrogado si alguna vez él le había preguntado a Jackson si el niño había dormido en su cama.

"Sí, dijo que no había pasado nada. Afirmó que no había hecho nada para pensar que se tratara de algo sexual y que si alguien había pasado la noche en su habitación fue por amor incondicional", declaró Geragos.

El abogado también hizo una fuerte defensa de su ex cliente al describir su primera visita al rancho Neverland, una propiedad de Jackson.

"Cuando estuve allá, vi a un caballero que se mostraba casi infantil en su amor por los niños. No pude ver a alguien que hiciera algo nefasto o criminal, vi a alguien que estaba listo para convertirse en blanco (de demandas)", indicó el abogado.

Geragos indicó que fue contratado en febrero de 2003 cuando fue difundido un documental en el que Jackson se mostraba con el niño que ahora lo acusa de haber abusado sexualmente de él.

Al ser interrogado por el abogado actual de Jackson, Thomas Mesereau, Geragos dijo que le preocupaban los alegatos surgidos del documental, pues el niño o su familia podrían aprovecharse de él.

Geragos indicó que al hacer búsquedas en bases de datos para constatar si la familia había tenido "un historial de litigios", le preocupó descubrir que ya habían demandado a la empresa de tiendas minoristas J.C. Penney bajo alegatos de que fueron golpeados por personal de seguridad de la tienda. La familia recibió una compensación fuera de la corte de 150.000 dólares

Geragos indicó que contrató a un investigador privado para analizar a la familia y los resultados le llevaron a pensar que la familia significaría problemas.

"Michael no debería haber tenido tratos con ellos, pues se trataba de un desastre en ciernes", indicó Geragos.

Sin embargo, Jackson relevó a Geragos en su encomienda de abogado en abril del 2004.

Jackson, de 46 años, está acusado de haber abusado de un niño de 13 años enfermo de cáncer en febrero o marzo del 2003 y que incluso le dio a beber vino. Asimismo, se le acusa de haber conspirado para mantener cautiva a la familia del menor para obligarlos a filmar un vídeo para rechazar lo descrito en el documental.
 
Última edición:
sbnplogo.gif


http://news.newspress.com/topsports/051405jackson.htm

Geragos: 'He was a ripe target'

5/14/05

By DAWN HOBBS
NEWS-PRESS STAFF WRITER

Lawyer says he protected Jackson from exploitation

In a day of high courtroom drama, Michael Jackson's former criminal lawyer, Mark Geragos, testified Friday that he had attempted to protect the entertainer from a predatory family -- not facilitate what the prosecution alleges was a conspiracy.

(...)

The noted defense lawyer told jurors that immediately after meeting the mother of the boy who would later accuse the entertainer of molestation, he became suspicious of her and hired a private eye to investigate the woman's background.

He also instructed the investigator to surveil the family -- an activity the prosecution alleges was part of an elaborate conspiracy to abduct, falsely imprison and extort the boy and his family.

"Did you ever conspire to commit any crime?" lead defense lawyer Thomas Mesereau asked.

"Absolutely not," Mr. Geragos said. "I was just trying to prevent a crime from being committed against my client."

"What crime is that?" Mr. Mesereau continued.

"I thought that they were going to shake him down," Mr. Geragos said.

The defense called Mr. Geragos to rebut the prosecution's conspiracy allegations.

Mr. Geragos said he met the mother at Neverland Valley Ranch on Feb. 7, 2003, the day after a British documentary aired and created a public relations firestorm -- including cries for social service and criminal investigations of the entertainer. The documentary showed Mr. Jackson holding hands with the woman's son as the entertainer states he innocently shares his bed with children.

Mr. Geragos said he was hired to determine whether any investigations of Mr. Jackson had commenced. While at Neverland, he heard the boy had been instructed to refer to Mr. Jackson as "Daddy."

"It gave me reason to pause," Mr. Geragos testified. "In response to that, I decided to run a database search . . . I was concerned at that point, given the situation, that someone might use the situation to manipulate my client. It was not unknown to me that my client was a frequent target of litigation. . . . He was a ripe target."

He said he became gravely concerned when his search unearthed a lawsuit the mother filed against J.C. Penney Co. She received a $150,000 settlement. Mr. Geragos testified that he instructed private investigator Bradley Miller to get a tape-recorded statement from the family and to surveil them in case they tried to sell their story to tabloids or file suit against the entertainer.

Senior Deputy District Attorney Ron Zonen's cross-examination of Mr. Geragos was so aggressive that Judge Rodney Melville called for a timeout.

The high-stakes legal wrangling peaked when Mr. Geragos said Mr. Jackson had waived attorney-client privilege only for the period up to the entertainer's arrest in November 2003. The judge then stopped the testimony and sent the jury out of the room.

Judge Melville said he thought there had been a total waiver of privilege and accused Mr. Mesereau of misrepresentation. After the defense lawyer apologized, the judge said he would rule on the issue on Monday.

Mr. Geragos' investigation of the accuser's family began Feb. 7 and ended in mid-March 2003, the time when the prosecution alleges Mr. Jackson and his associates were holding the family against their will until they agreed to participate in a video to counter the documentary. The boy claims that Mr. Jackson molested him after that.

(...)

Prosecutors allege that Jackson associates moved the family out of their East Los Angeles apartment and put their belongings in storage because they were preparing to whisk them to Brazil. But Mr. Geragos testified that the mother asked his private investigator to help her store the items because she was moving in with her boyfriend. He said at that time he knew nothing about the planned Brazil trip.

On cross-examination, Mr. Zonen asked Mr. Geragos whether he had seen the documentary that contains "an admission to sleeping with boys."

"What do you mean, sleeping with boys?" Mr. Geragos asked.

"That he sleeps with boys," Mr. Zonen said.

"You mean that boys stay in his room?" Mr. Geragos asked.

"I mean that he sleeps with boys," Mr. Zonen said.

"Are you saying it's sexual?" Mr. Geragos asked.

The heated exchange continued until the judge told Mr. Zonen to take a timeout. When questioning resumed, the prosecutor asked whether Mr. Geragos advised his client not to sleep with boys.

Mr. Geragos responded he did not: "I saw someone who was childlike in his love for kids. I saw nothing criminal. Nothing nefarious."

When asked what Mr. Jackson told him later about it, Mr. Geragos said, "He has consistently said he didn't do anything -- nothing untoward, nothing sexual and if someone spends the night in his room, it was just an act of unconditional love.

"The problem, Mr. Zonen, is when people say 'sleeping with someone in his room' and then there's this jump to it being something awful and really, really bad."

Mr. Geragos is scheduled to return to the stand on May 20.
 
logo.gif


Geragos said he asked private investigator Brad Miller to keep tabs on the family to find out "where they were, what they were doing and who they were meeting with." He also asked Miller to record a statement with the family so that they would be "locked into" their version of events and could not later change their story.

He described the results of Miller's investigation of the family as "negative," and he said he concluded, "Michael should have nothing to do with them."

"It was a pending train wreck," he said.

However, Geragos denied involvement in any conspiracy to hold the family against their will, as the prosecution alleges.

(...)

Jackson replaced Geragos in April 2004 with his current attorney, Thomas Mesereau Jr.

At the time, Geragos was in the middle of representing Scott Peterson -- later sentenced to death for the murder of his pregnant wife, Laci -- and Jackson said he made the decision because "it is imperative that I have the full attention of those who are representing me."

(...)

"People were making all kinds of allegations ... specifically about one young man, and I was to look into that," Geragos said. His "first concern" was whether the state Division of Children and Family Services might try to take away Jackson's three children.

Shortly after being hired, Geragos went to Jackson's Neverland Ranch for his planned interview with "60 Minutes" journalist Ed Bradley. While there, he said, a Jackson associate told him things about the boy and his family "that were giving me great pause" -- particularly the fact that the boy was calling Jackson "daddy."

Geragos said he had a conversation with Jackson objecting to how the boy was referring to him. He said he eventually "pulled the plug" on the interview.

"It was not going to happen," he said.

[CNN.com]

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/05/13/jackson.trial/index.html
 
frontlogo.jpg


También el Viernes, la defensa de Jackson relleno una moción para llamar a testificar a un empleado de Neverland, Angel Vivanco.

Vivanco dice que la hermana del acusador (Davellin) le dijo aque su madre y su entonces novio estaban planeando "algo grande" sobre Jackson, de acuerdo con la moción. Este testimonio puede apoyar los argumentos de la defensa de que las acusaciones contra Jackson fueron motivadas por dinero.

Este testigo potencial también puede ofrecer testimonio de como Gavin y Star bebían alcohol y veían revistas porno en Neverland sin la presencia de Jackson, dice la defensa.

La fiscalía ha rellenado su propia moción oponiendose al testimonio de Vicanco, diciendo que es inadmisible [en relaidad dicen "inadmissible hearsay", pero no se que es "hearsay".]

http://www.santamariatimes.com/articles/2005/05/14/news/local/news02.txt

[Santa Maria Times]
 
[font=arial, helvetica]El ex abogado de Jackson sospechaba de la familia del acusador[/font]SANTA MARIA, EEUU (AFP) - El ex abogado de Michael Jackson declaró ante el jurado del juicio al músico por presunto abuso sexual a un menor, cómo ordenó vigilar a la familia del chico ante el temor de que pudieran intentar chantajear a la estrella.

"Estaba tratando de prevenir un crimen contra mi cliente. Yo creía que ellos iban a intentar derribarlo", dijo Mark Geragos en el juzgado.



[size=-2]http://es.celebrities.yahoo.com/050514/159/424a9.html[/size]

Geragos había sido contratado por Jackson en febrero de 2003 para colaborar ante las consecuencias del perjudicial documental emitido por la televisión británica en el que el cantante aparece de la mano del menor que lo acusa de violación y admite que comparte su cama con niños.

La controversia generada por el documental derivó en el actual juicio contra Jackson con cargos que incluyen el de violar a un menor de 13 años, obligarlo a beber alcohol y conspirar para secuestrarlo junto a su familia.



Geragos, que trabajó para Jackson por 16 meses antes de ser sustituido en abril del año pasado, dijo que estaba tan preocupado por las intenciones de la familia del menor que contrató a un investigador privado y los puso bajo vigilancia.



"Cosas que escuché sobre ellos me dieron gran temor", indicó Geragos.



"Estaba consternado al punto que, teniendo en cuenta lo que estaba sucediendo, alguien podía manipular a mi cliente", agregó. "Yo quería saber dónde estaban, qué estaban haciendo, con quién se reunían".



Dijo que sus sospechas se confirmaron en parte cuando la base de datos reveló una anterior imputación sobre abuso sexual que la madre del menor había interpuesto contra una cadena de tiendas.



Luego de una investigación que duró seis meses, Geragos concluyó que Jackson debería cortar todo tipo de lazo con la familia del menor.



En el interrogatorio previo de la defensa, compareció otro ex abogado del cantante, David LeGrand, quien pintó a Jackson como un hombre inocente rodeado de socios angurrientos y engañado por el autor del poco halagüeño documental que resultó determinante para el origen del juicio.



LeGrand sólo trabajó para Jackson por pocos meses, y que fue expulsado a comienzos de 2003 luego de pedirles explicaciones por el destino de casi dos millones de dólares a dos de los asesores de la estrella, que ellos mismos se habrían embolsado, aseguró el abogado.



"Me volví sospechoso para todo el mundo", dijo. "Parece que todo el mundo quería beneficiarse de Michael Jackson de una u otra manera".



La imagen de Jackson como la víctima inocente de un círculo íntimo que abusaba de él es la clave de su defensa ante el cargo de conspirar con sus asistentes para secuestrar en la finca Neverland a la familia del menor que lo acusa de abuso sexual

050514113635.ssdl80pa0b.jpg


http://es.celebrities.yahoo.com/050514/159/424aa.html
 
Atrás
Arriba